Data Science for Linguists 2019

Course home for
LING 1340/2340

HOME
Policies
Term project guidelines
Learning resources by topic
Schedule table

Daily To-do Assignments

To-do #1

Due 1/10 (Th), 3:30pm

The Internet is full of published linguistic data sets. Let’s data-surf! Instructions:

  1. Go out and find two linguistic data sets you like. One should be a corpus, the other should be some other format. They must be free and downloadable in full. Make sure they are linguistic data sets, meaning designed for linguistic inquiries.
  2. You might want to start with various bookmark sites listed in the following Learning Resources sections: Linguistic Data, Open Access, Data Publishing and Corpus Linguistics. But don’t be constrained by them.
  3. Download the data sets and poke around. Open up a file or two to take a peek. (No need to do this in Python.)
  4. In a text file (should have the .txt extension), make note of:
    • The name of the data resource
    • The author(s)
    • The URL of the download page
    • Its makeup: size, type of language, format, etc.
    • License: whether it comes with one, and if so what kind?
    • Anything else noteworthy about the data. A sentence or two will do.
  5. If you are comfortable with markdown, make an .md file instead of a text file.

SUBMISSION: Upload your text file to To-do1 submission link, on CourseWeb.

To-do #2

Due 1/17 (Th), 3:30pm

Learn about the numpy library: study the Python Data Science Handbook and/or the DataCamp tutorial. While doing so, create your own study notes, as a Jupyter Notebook file entitled numpy_notes_yourname.ipynb. Include examples, explanations, etc. Replicating DataCamp’s examples is also something you could do. You are essentially creating your own reference material.

SUBMISSION: Your file should be in the todo2/ directory of the Class-Exercise-Repo. Make sure it’s configured for the “upstream” remote and your fork is up-to-date. Push to your GitHub fork, and create a pull request for me.

To-do #3

Due 1/22 (Tue)

Study the pandas library (through the Python Data Science Handbook and/or the DataCamp tutorials). pandas is a big topic with lots to learn: aim for about 1/2. While doing so, try it out on TWO spreadsheet (.csv, .tsv, etc.) files:

  1. The first file should be your choice. You can get one from this CSV Files archive, or make up your own. Keep it super simple! It’s supposed to be a toy dataset.
  2. The second one should be billboard_lyrics_1964-2015.csv by Kaylin Pavlik, from her project ‘50 Years of Pop Music’. (Note: you might need to specify ISO8859 encoding.)

Name your Jupyter Notebook file pandas_notes_yourname.ipynb. Don’t change the filename of any downloaded CSV files or edit them in any way.

SUBMISSION: Your files should be in the todo3/ directory of Class-Exercise-Repo. Commit and push all three files to your GitHub fork, and create a pull request for me.

To-do #4

Due 1/24 (Thu)

This one is a continuation of To-do #3: work further on your pandas study notes. You may create a new JNB file, or you can expand the existing one. Also: try out a spreadsheet submitted by a classmate. You are welcome to view the classmate’s notebook to see what they did with it. (How to find out who submitted what? Git/GitHub history of course.) Give them a shout-out.

SUBMISSION: We’ll stick to the todo3/ directory in Class-Exercise-Repo. Push to your GitHub fork, and create a pull request for me.

To-do #5

Due 2/5 (Tue), 3:30pm

For this To-do, refer back to the edited version of english.csv from class Activity 3. Add a markdown cell block to your Jupyter Notebook file for activity3 clearly labeling the beginning of To-do #5.

This time we’ll look at the response times for the naming task (RTnaming). The equipment that Balota et al. used to gather this naming data was voice-activated. As such, the acoustic properties of a word’s initial segment may have affected the time it took to register a response. Let’s figure out whether it did.

  1. Inspect the distribution of naming latencies.
    • Plot two histograms for the naming latencies, with different bin sizes.
    • Plot the density of the naming latencies. Is this a normal distribution?
  2. The column Voice specifies whether a word’s initial phoneme was voiced or voiceless. Make a boxplot for the distribution of reaction times across voiced and voiceless phonemes, grouped by subject age.

SUBMISSION: Submit a pull request including your updated JNB file.

To-do #6

Due 2/12 (Tue)

The Gries & Newman article cites many famous corpora and corpus resources. Let’s round them all up in a single spot, complete with web links. We will collaborate on a shared document called 'corpora_tools_list.md'.

Your job is to fill out the three tables: add at least one entry to each table. Make sure you are not duplicating someone else’s entry. Because everyone is editing the same document, you may run into a conflict while trying to push. Make sure you have read and understood this tutorial on Git conflicts and resolve accordingly.

SUBMISSION: There is no formal submission process, because this one does not involve you issuing a pull request or anything like that. I will check on the repo later to see you have indeed made your contribution.

To-do #7

Due 2/14 (Thu)

Let’s pool our questions together for Dr. Lauren Collister, who will be our guest speaker on Thursday. Review the topics of linguistic data, open access, and data publishing, focusing in particular on these three resources: Data Management Plans for Linguistic Research, Kitzes (2018), and the Copyright and Intellectual Property Toolkit. Think of a question for Lauren, and add yours along with your name to the questions_collister.md file in our Class-Plaza repo.

SUBMISSION: Push your commit directly to the Class-Plaza repo. Make sure you don’t trample on someone else’s contribution. If there is a conflict, it is your job to resolve it.

To-do #8

Due 2/19 (Tue)

Let’s try Twitter mining! On a tiny scale that is. This blog post Data Analysis using Twitter presents an easy-to-follow, step-by-step tutorial, so you should follow it along.

First, you will need to install the tweepy library:

Notes on using tweepy:

SUBMISSION: We are switching back to Class-Exercise-Repo; use the todo8/ folder. Your Jupyter Notebook file should have your name in the file name. Push to your fork and create a pull request. Make sure you have redacted your personal API keys!

To-do #9

Due 2/26 (Tue)

Let’s try sentiment analysis on movie reviews. Follow this tutorial in your own Jupyter Notebook file. Feel free to explore and make changes as you see fit. If you haven’t already, review the Python Data Science Handbook chapters to give yourself a good grounding. Also: watch DataCamp tutorials Supervised Learning with scikit-learn, and NLP Fundamentals in Python.

Students who took LING 1330 (=everyone): compare sklearn’s Naive Bayes with NLTK’s treatment and include a blurb on your impression. (You don’t have to run NLTK’s code, unless you want to!)

SUBMISSION: Your jupyter notebook file should be in the todo9 folder of Class-Exercise-Repo. As usual, push to your fork and create a pull request.

To-do #10

Due 2/28 (Thu)

What have the previous students of LING 1340/2340 accomplished? What do finished projects look like? Let’s have you explore their past projects. Details:

SUBMISSION: Push your commit directly to the Class-Plaza repo. Make sure you don’t trample on someone else’s contribution. If there is a conflict, it is your job to resolve it.

To-do #11

Due 3/7 (Thu)

What has everyone been up to? Let’s take a look – it’s a “visit your classmates” day!

SUBMISSION: Since Class-Plaza is a fully collaborative repo, there is no formal submission process.

To-do #12

Due 3/21 (Thu)

Let’s poke at big data. Well, big-ish. The Yelp DataSet Challenge is now on its 13th round, where Yelp has made their huge review dataset available for academic groups that participate in a data mining competition. Challenge accepted! Before we begin:

Mode of operation

Step 1: Preparation, exploration

Let’s download this beast and poke around.

  1. Download the JSON portion of the data. (We don’t need the photos.)
  2. Move the downloaded archive file into your Documents/Data_Science directory. You might want to create a new folder there for the data files.
  3. From this point on, operate exclusively in command line.
  4. The file is in the .tar format. Look it up if you are not familiar. Untar it using tar -xvf. I will extract 6 json files along with some PDF documents.
  5. Using various unix commands (ls -laFh, head, tail, wc -l, etc.), find out: how big are the json files? What do the contents look like? How many reviews are there?
  6. How many reviews use the word ‘horrible’? Find out through grep and wc -l. Take a look at the first few through head | less. Do they seem to have high or low stars?
  7. How many reviews use the word ‘scrumptious’? Do they seem to have high stars this time?

Step 2: A stab at processing

How much processing can our own puny personal computer handle? Let’s find out.

  1. First, take stock of your computer hardware: disk space, memory, processor, and how old it is.
  2. Create a Python script file: process_reviews.py. Content below. You can use nano, or you could use your favorite editor (atom, notepad++) provided that you launch the application through command line.
import pandas as pd
import sys
from collections import Counter

filename = sys.argv[1]

df = pd.read_json(filename, lines=True, encoding='utf-8')
print(df.head(5))

wtoks = ' '.join(df['text']).split()
wfreq = Counter(wtoks)
print(wfreq.most_common(20))
  1. We are NOT going to run this on the whole review.json file! Start small by creating a tiny version consisting of the first 10 lines, named FOO.json, using head and >.
  2. Then, run process_reviews.py on FOO.json. Note that the json file should be supplied as command-line argument to the Python script. Confirm it runs successfully.
  3. Next, re-create FOO.json with incrementally larger total # of lines and re-run the Python script. The point is to find out how much data your system can reasonably handle. Could that be 1,000 lines? 100,000?
  4. While running this experiment, closely monitor the process on your machine. Windows users should use Task Manager, and Mac users should use Activity Monitor.
  5. Finally, write up a short reflection summary as yelp_tryout_yourname.md. A paragraph will do. How was your laptop’s handling of this data set? What sorts of resources would it take to successfully process it in its entirety and through more computationally demanding processes? Any other observations?

SUBMISSION: Your markdown file should be in the todo12 directory in Class-Exercise-Repo. As usual, push to your fork and create a pull request.

To-do #13

Due 3/26 (Tue)

It’s “visit your classmates” day, round 2!

SUBMISSION: Since Class-Plaza is a fully collaborative repo, there is no formal submission process.

To-do #14

Due 4/2 (Tue)

Visit your classmates, round 3.

To-do #15

Due 4/4 (Thu), 3:30pm This To-do is a (re)introduction to Praat, everyone’s favorite idiosyncratic phonetics data analysis tool, as well as to the TIMIT Corpus, which is located in the Licensed Data Sets repo.

  1. Download and install the newest version of Praat. (Praat changes often and drastically, so this really is important to do.) Also note that the full Praat “manual” is on this site, but it is not well organized.

  2. Read the documentation for the TIMIT corpus (Licensed-Data-Sets/TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus/timit/TIMIT/README.DOC).

  3. From within Praat, open the files associated with SA1 for speaker FCJF0 (/TIMIT/TRAIN/DR1/FCJF0/SA1.*). Note that one file cannot be opened by Praat, and another will kick up a warning.

  4. From the Praat Objects window, select the two TextGrid objects and Merge them. Then select the resulting TextGrid “merged” and the Sound “SA1” and View & Edit them.

SUBMISSION: Upload a markdown file with your observations, and with any questions you have, to the to-do15 directory in Class-Exercise-Repo.

To-do #16

Due 4/11 (Thu) 4th and final round of visit your classmates. Also the last To-do!